At the AARP-sponsored debate earlier this week, Dan told the audience that he would never consider privatizing social security accounts.
He said "Supplemental ideas are what I’ve talked about, not replacing Social Security with private accounts".
In front of the seniors this would affect, that's his view.
On the Lisa Wexler show on September 6th, it was another story:
“Well, this is something I wouldn’t support a full privatization like President Bush had originally proposed. I actually do think we want Social Security there to make sure that no senior is in poverty—because that’s the purpose of it, no senior is in poverty. Now, would we have an optional system where you would have the option (to) take some portion of your funds and invest them? I think that is something we should look at.”
Maybe he should write these little things down?
No comments:
Post a Comment